Most Americans define ‘rich’ as anyone that makes more money than they do. I define it like this:
Rich
/ˌriCH/
adjective
- The point at which your investments generate enough income to cover your expenses; working for a paycheck is optional.
- “She can do whatever she’d like with her time because her expenses are covered by a portion of the money her portfolio generates; working for a paycheck is now optional.”
- Synonyms: financially independent, FIRE, wealthy
- See also, F**k you money
How Much Money Do I Need To Be Rich?
Being rich means something different to everyone but rich doesn’t mean cruising around in your limo, dressed up like Mr. Peanut or Rich Uncle Pennybags. Rich is not living like the upstairs people at Downton Abby.
Rich IS having enough money to buy your freedom. Freedom is the ability to do whatever you want to do with your time.
Freedom is the best thing your money can buy and figuring out how much that freedom will cost you is pretty easy.
How Much Do You Need To Retire Early?
It turns out that your financial freedom will cost you about 25 times you annual expenses. Take your annual expenses and multiply that by 25 to get your magic number.
If you can live on $20,000 per year, then your magic number is $500,000 ($20,000 x 25). If you need $100,000 per year to get by, then your number is $2.5 million ($100,000 x 25). Once you build up a portfolio that is equal to 25 times your expenses, then you’ll be able to retire early.
What Is The 4% Rule
The 4% Rule says that on average your stock market investments will grow at 7% per year. From that 7% growth, you’ll be able to spend 4% and leave the remaining 3% invested in order to keep up with the average rate of inflation.* In theory, you never touch your principal investment, only a portion of the growth.
As you can see from the table below, if you only spend 4% and leave the remaining 3% invested, you’ll have enough money to live on for the rest of your life, while keeping up with inflation.** And this is important because we know that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow!
Or you if you don’t want to do any math you can use this calculator:
- To use the calculator start by entering the amount of your expense in question (by default this is $100).
- Next, use the drop down menu to choose whether this expense is daily, weekly, monthly or yearly.
- Finally, use the slider at the bottom of the calculator to choose your safe withdraw rate. 4% is the default, but some plan on withdrawing more or less from their portfolio. Pick the SWR that works for you.
How Long Does It Take To Get Rich
The time it will take you to become rich (a.k.a. “financially independent”) depends upon a few things, namely:
- The amount of money you need to live on. The more money you need to get by, the more you’ll need to save in order to meet this need. Inversely, the less money you need to get by, the less you need to save up.
- The percentage of your income that you save. If for some reason you can’t save any money whatsoever, then your savings rate is 0% and you’ll never be financially independent, because you’ll always need a paycheck to get by. If you’re on the opposite end of that example and you’re able to save 100% of your income, then you’re already there. Congratulations!
With this information you are now in total control – figure out how much money you need to get by each year, then save up 25 times that amount. The second your expenses are covered by your investments, you are free to do whatever you want to do with your time because once you’ve reached this point, your money has purchased your freedom and you are officially rich!
Want to keep grinding away at your current job? Go for it!
Want to become a Walmart Greeter? Knock yourself out.
Want to lay on a beach doing nothing? Volunteer at a non-profit? Search for Bigfoot in the Pacific Northwest?
When your assets generate income that is greater than your expenses you can do whatever you want!
Notes & Updates
* The stock market is like an EKG machine and not like an up-moving escalator. Some years your investments will not only miss the 7% growth rate, but you’ll actually LOSE money that year. Yikes – that’s scary! But don’t panic just yet because other years your investments will grow at a MUCH greater rate than 7%. That’s why I’ve bolded the word average, because it all evens out. Over time the stock market always goes up. By an average of 7% annually, after adjusting for inflation. If you want to read and learn even more about how simple and easy saving and planning for retirement can be, I highly recommend this book, The Simple Path to Wealth, by Jim Collins, which is easy to read and understand. I own it and refer to it often:
**The 4% rule is also sometimes called the Safe Withdrawal Rate, which is to say “how much money can I safely withdraw from my account without fear of every running out?” 4% is that amount, but I’ve only scratched the surface of the 4% rule in this post. Here are some additional posts on this controversial topic, some with differing points of view, that I recommend you check out:
- The 4% rule: The easy answer to ‘How much do I need for retirement?’ by Mr. Money Mustache
- Safe withdrawal rate for early retirees by Mad Fientist
- Understanding sequence of returns risk – Safe withdrawal rates, bear market crashes, and bad decades by Michael Kitces
16 replies on “How Much Money Do I Need to be Rich?”
You seem to have a flawed understanding of the 4% rule. It’s not simply 7% gains minus 3% inflation equals 4% safe withdrawal rate even though I see that incorrectly mentioned fairly often.
Average market returns are closer to 9%, but will depend on your overall asset allocation. The reason the 4% + inflation doesn’t equal market returns is to account for the potential of early years being down and causing a drawdown of principal aka sequence of returns. In more cases than not, your principal will grow significantly even as you withdraw 4% per year of the initial amount inflation adjusted.
Here’s my favorite article on the subject if you don’t want to take my word for it:
http://www.madfientist.com/safe-withdrawal-rate/
Rich should be defined by everyone different. If you want to be like uber-wealthy, you will have a different strategy than those who only want to make a comfortable living for themselves.
Hey MM, I love that article as well!
I think your concern is in reference to the importance of the early sequence of returns you get when first relying on your retirement portfolio. This post wasn’t intended to deep dive into the SWR, but you bring up a valid point so I’ll add a note and a link to Brandon’s article, which is incredibly helpful.
But that doesn’t change the fact that at a basic level the 4% rule says that your investments “appreciate in price at a total rate of 7% per year, before inflation. Inflation eats 3% on average, leaving you with 4% to spend reliably, forever.” The article you link to says as much as does this one from Mr. Money Mustache: http://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/05/29/how-much-do-i-need-for-retirement/
Hey Kelly, totally agree. The more money you need to live on, the more you’ll need to save in order to meet that need. Inversely, the less money you need to get by, the less you need to save up.
Thanks for the first ever comment on this blog!
I appreciate the amendment to the article, the common 7% gains – 3% inflation = 4% SWR misconception is a bit of a pet peeve of mine. At first glance it looks like it leaves no margin for error and would fail with the slightest bit of bad luck. I think some of the push-back on the 4% SWR is due to this fact, but certainly not all.
I try to describe the 4% rule myself as 10% average gains, 3% inflation, and a 3% buffer to account for potential down years in which you need to cut into the principal. My goal is to drive home how safe the 4% rule really is as the great articles we’ve linked explain in more detail.
Thanks for responding and I really enjoyed the article! I wish we could preach to everyone that a simple life of freedom is just a decent savings % away.
Cheers!
Love how this simplifies things and puts retirement needs into perspective. If this is not enough motivation to cut daily expenses, I don’t know what is!
Hey MM, I love that article as well!
I think your concern is in reference to the importance of the early sequence of returns you get when first relying on your retirement portfolio. This post wasn't intended to deep dive into the SWR, but you bring up a valid point so I'll add a note and a link to Brandon's article, which is incredibly helpful.
But that doesn't change the fact that at a basic level the 4% rule says that your investments “appreciate in price at a total rate of 7% per year, before inflation. Inflation eats 3% on average, leaving you with 4% to spend reliably, forever.” The article you link to says as much as does this one from Mr. Money Mustache: http://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/05/29/how-much-do-i-need-for-retirement/
Hey Kelly, totally agree. The more money you need to live on, the more you’ll need to save in order to meet that need. Inversely, the less money you need to get by, the less you need to save up.
Thanks for the first ever comment on this blog!
Thanks, Lady FruFru!
Thanks, Lady FruFru!
Hey Unknown –
Thanks for commenting. Sounds like we're both big fans of the SWR, although I'm unclear on where you feel I'm misrepresenting? I think you take exception with the 'sequence of returns' addendum that I added? If so, check out this post from Michael Kitces in which the Sequence of returns is addressed: https://www.kitces.com/blog/understanding-sequence-of-return-risk-safe-withdrawal-rates-bear-market-crashes-and-bad-decades/
Mad Fientist also has a great post on SWR where he addresses the timing of market ups & downs in relation to your retirement date: http://www.madfientist.com/safe-withdrawal-rate/
I think you are doing a disservice to you readers by misrepresenting the 4% rule. The 4% rule came about by analysis of what withdrawal rate would allow a hypothetical retiree to have a 95% confidence of portfolio survival given historical stock and bond returns covering 30 year retirement periods. In other words – sequence of returns risk is already accounted for and even covers a retiree that retired right before the worst market crashes going back over 100 years. That's why the 4% rule is very conservative and “safe.” Please check out the Trinity study and William Bengen
Even though I don’t use the term ‘rich’ as I prefer ‘wealthy’ your description is pretty close to my own … which is, you are wealthy when you can live your chosen lifestyle on portfolio (savings/investments) and passive (defined benefit plans, pensions) income.
Rich, wealthy, financially independent …. I use the words almost interchangeably.
I also love your definition
Awesome article that helps ease the mind when planning to retire with less than a million. Can we change the definition of rich in the dictionary to the elegant one in this post now please!?!?
To eat good food, to live in a comfortable home, to own a reliable car, to be with those I love and to work with clients who pay me well. These are all simply practical (and even healthy) things to have in a modern, everyday life.
In fact, it has been proven time and time again that after our basic necessities of life are met the correlation between having more and our happiness declines i.e. more doesn’t make you happier or give you a more fulfilling life.
“The things you own end up owning you.” Fight Club
I am enough. I have always been enough. I just wasn’t aware of it until now.